TrustCyber Blog
Research, guides, and analysis for IT leaders, security teams, and compliance professionals running Microsoft environments.
Featured
Microsoft Secure Score tells you how well you've implemented security controls. It doesn't tell you how much risk you're carrying. Here's why that distinction is critical for compliance reporting and board conversations.
NIST CSF 2.0 introduced the Govern function and expanded scope. Here's how each function maps to Microsoft 365 and Defender controls — and where the gaps typically appear.
Most organizations focus on their own Microsoft security posture. Fewer examine the risk introduced by third-party vendors with privileged access to their Microsoft environments. Here's what to look for.
SOC 2 auditors want evidence, not assertions. This guide covers the specific Microsoft 365 logs, reports, and configurations that satisfy each Trust Service Criteria category.
Healthcare organizations running Microsoft workloads face a specific set of HIPAA technical safeguard requirements. We analyzed 50 assessments to identify the controls most commonly misconfigured or missing.
Boards don't want technical details. They want to understand risk exposure, trend direction, and the cost of inaction. Here's how to structure a security report that drives decisions.
CIS Controls v8 reorganized the framework around implementation groups. Here's a detailed mapping of which controls Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Identity, and Cloud Apps address — and which require additional tooling.
The updated FTC Safeguards Rule requires specific technical controls for financial institutions. Here's how to satisfy each requirement using Microsoft 365 and Azure capabilities.
Stay Current
New research, compliance guides, and risk intelligence for Microsoft-centric organizations. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
We send one email per month. No tracking pixels.